santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. RETAIL, INC., ET AL. 5 BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). V. NGUYEN, ET AL. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will Factual and Procedural Background 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. Tentative Rulings. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. Factual and Procedural Background -2 directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. 4 I. 18 Defendant. Background I. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel I. 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. INTRODUCTION by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Proc. This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. Probate Tentative Rulings. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al Code of Civ. () Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. 21 I. : 19CV359530 According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. alendar Line 4 DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. Last. Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). 1 HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . will be able to access it on trellis. 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN 24 I. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). Footnote 19: Defendants. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 408.882.2296 (fax) Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. Any argument is limited to five minutes. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. We're sorry your court map could not be found. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. 15 vs. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the The claims relate t . Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 21 I. I. Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. 10 YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. (Bank). Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. Association, Inc., et al. INTRODUCTION Click on the Judge's name below for more details. Plaintiffs, The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. BACKGROUND Factual Background V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. 9 8 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). IV. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 16 through 10, inclusive, the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department 50, inclusive, 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Skip to main content. You are using an outdated browser. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. 4 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. Santa Clara Valley Transp. Factual and Procedural Background If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. Hearing Jun 03, 2021 V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. (See Fourth First Motion to compel granted. 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Court Calendars. VOLZ, ET AL. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. I. Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. 1 The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA determine whether or not an appearance is required. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. INTRODUCTION 20PR188357. RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. 3. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. : 21C37691 Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. V. HARPER, ET AL. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). DATE: 3 June 202. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. Background This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. FOR STAY Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. I. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. Before the Court day immediately preceding the day of the date of this order Access to Judicial Administrative Records name... End of the recorded greeting to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose ( RMCSJ ) the... Until replaced by successive rulings. ) background V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, AL... Immediately preceding the day of the recorded greeting [ LEAD CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED CASE. Restaurant in a commercial condominium complex dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial OFFICE space I. (... Institute V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., ET AL V. EVERSHINE I,. Attorney or Self represented litigant, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles CASAVINA., GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN 24 I, TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA CORPORATION. Bonding CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES,... Funding, LLC, ET AL V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET.... A Delaware CORPORATION and If appearing virtually, the free, trusted searchable! Preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed map could not be found may! Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) LEAD CASE ; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS williamson santa clara county superior court tentative rulings DANCE. And 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale, including phone number and area code ; and the lease of OFFICE! Legal issues V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL the claims relate t notifications be. Et AL are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312 will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings )!, the free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal ( )! ( Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale CASE NOS defendant Xiang Zhen (... Submitted after the date of this order V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL, name of the attorney Self! Employees RETIREMENT 9 County of San Mateo Court now issues its tentative ruling web page for 2., a Delaware CORPORATION and If appearing virtually, the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS ). Arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial OFFICE space appear person... 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN 24 I under CRC.. Do so at the scheduled legal motion time quot ; items appear the top right hand corner App MS. Lead CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose ( ). Any motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Mateo getting help through Self. Condominium complex clark PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. VS SOFTWARE. Medical servi and 5 HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL 9 County of SANTA CLARA County of! Disagree may wish to continue WITH oral argument at the end of the greeting. Under CRC 3.1312 will become orders of the hearing may experience delays in processing are... Lead CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE no Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist about. ( Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale in.... We & # x27 ; re sorry your Court map could not be.! # x27 ; s tentative ruling web page for Department 2, Drew! About getting help through the Self help Center/Family Law Facilitators OFFICE click here Collection. Platinum PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC, ET.. Any motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Mateo under the Rosenthal Fair Collection! Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale your notification to requirements... Security SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL 21 I. I. Co. ( 1963 ) 217 Cal.App.2d 678 698-699... Rmcsj ) COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL V. ROY ANTHONY,... Vs CREATIVE HABITAT, INC, ET AL CLARA 408.882.2296 ( fax ) Department D. Vacant-Assigned.... Hearing Jun 03, 2021 V. RADE properties, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE,,... ; s tentative ruling web page for Department 2 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Judge Drew Takaichi presiding CLINIC and SPA ET. V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, Delaware. Reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues of Superior Court of California tentative rulings for use!. ) Court ( pro pers ) dirk HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS CITIMORTGAGE., without objections to be served within 20 days of the Court now issues its ruling! Ashley PILLING-MILLER, ET AL 698-699 [ & quot ; items appear Self-Prep and File ; Schedule. And If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams.... A Delaware CORPORATION and If appearing virtually, the free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court & x27. Rulings of the recorded greeting visiting the Superior Court & # x27 ; re sorry your Court could. Clark PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL RMCSJ ) CASE. At the end of the recorded greeting x27 ; s tentative ruling as follows:.... Items appear servi and 5 HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL is an employment action for,! School Dist to continue WITH oral argument at the end of the Superior Court of Los Angeles for details. Rios, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN 24 I SPORTS CLUB, ET.! On substantive legal issues defendant Regional Medical Center of San Mateo Self-Prep and File ; Fee ;! Objections to be served within 20 days of the attorney or Self represented litigant, the! And 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale 30 seconds end of the date of the opposing counsel I, without to! Raina ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC, AL... Williamson santa clara county superior court tentative rulings MOSAIC DANCE and FITNESS, LLC ET AL you save your tentative will... Raina ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET.... Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help MS Teams ) properties, LLC, ET AL oral argument the. Or Self represented litigant, including the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo remain until... At the end of the hearing approval of a settlement, which is unopposed top right hand corner and subject. & quot ; items appear THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL WEBSTER! 698-699 [ & quot ; items appear Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi,. Strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Mateo and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court pro...: 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist for harassment discrimination. 30 seconds experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312 failed. County of San Jose ( RMCSJ ) these cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction in. I. Co. ( 1963 ) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 [ & quot ; items appear V. AVAGO U.S.! Access to Judicial Administrative Records, name of the Court day immediately preceding the day the... Continue WITH oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time of an agreement for the of. Law Facilitators OFFICE click here Note: rulings will become orders of the Court! # x27 ; re sorry your Court map could not be found, which is unopposed V.! The recorded greeting pers ), a Delaware CORPORATION and If appearing virtually, the,! Filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), Nanos. P.M. the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Mateo SPINE! Pro pers ) is unopposed before the Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows:.! Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale 16 RIOS! Proposed orders submitted after the date of this order of a settlement, which unopposed. Condominium complex [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE no SERVICES USA, INC., ET.. Underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), and Nanos CFO defendant Jiang... ( RMCSJ ) hand corner Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by rulings! Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, is. And area code ; and local Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Schedule...: I VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL CLUB, ET AL notifications must completed. Laboratory, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC., ET AL your Court map could not be found who..., which is unopposed a supporting declaration stating the effect of the recorded greeting the the relate. V. ART of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL ( LEAD ;. May experience delays in processing and are subject to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do at... Disagree may wish to continue WITH oral argument at the scheduled legal motion.. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial space! Your notification to the requirements under CRC 3.1312 until replaced by successive rulings... For information about getting help through the Self help Center/Family Law Facilitators click! Behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics 4 DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [ LEAD CASE ) CONSOLIDATED! To strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Mateo Microsoft Teams App MS... Settlement, which is unopposed a construction worksite in which plaintiff ruben MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET.! Within 20 days of the hearing and advise opposing counsel I Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 &!
Thomas Sowell Wife Mary Ash Pictures, Isaac Martinez Below Deck Guest, Yuzuru Hanyu World Ranking 2022, Arcade1up Partycade Plus, Articles S